How Failure Has Changed Over The Centries - 1454 Words

The way in which failure has been viewed has changed over the centries. As early as ancient Athens, we have seen records of how failure is seen from time-to-time and society-to-society. Just them as a comparative to our society recognizes the cultural difference as well as the time gap between how we perceive defeat. For instance, Athens used plays to communicate that failing at something was okay and that we needed to show sympathy and helpfulness to those going through a rough time. Whereas today, as seen in many cases, dropping out of something, or even not succeeding is failure; you must do well in something to be respected. In the three sources presented, recordly, this is the case. Each source reviewed and discussed the art of failing as something more than just one mistake, that it is many complied onto each other causing, as we see it, catastrophe. In all three sources, they discusses success and failure seen in today’s society, which were then analyzed through agreeme nt/overlap and disagreement. To begin, all three sources overlap/agree with the same message, that failure is common, but not accepted. They all suggest that we should learn to become acquainted with it. The more you recognize what you’re not good at and fix it (whether it be dropping it or applying a method) the faster you can find things you are good at. And, they all state this with reason to support the chance that appears. For instance, in Outliers, Gladwell explains the chance of a plane crash.Show MoreRelatedThe Role of the Internet in Supply Chain Management1872 Words   |  7 Pagessuperior customer value at less cost to the supply chain as a whole. (Christopher, 1998). An increase in competitions means that companies must combine together to form a network of organizations. Failure or refusal of doing so would result in falling behind to the company’s rivals. The Internet has an important role in supply chain management because it enables real-time information and collaboration between trading partners, which makes decision making easier. Gunasekaran and Ngai (2004) refers